|
Giving parents the right to choose the educational experience that
best meets the needs of their own
children is morally right. However, making it possible politically has
proven to be difficult. In the early 90's, it was
thought that government vouchers would
provide the answer. However, recent court decisions have
demonstrated that with government funds
come government strings. Consider the premier example of a
working voucher program - the Milwaukee, Wisconsin schools:
In considering the constitutionality of Milwaukee's program, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that:
Vouchers create another government bureaucracy, which must be funded. So even if vouchers are secured in a given year, the battle must be re-fought in the following year's budget. And not only must vouchers win, they must win in ever-increasing funding amounts or inflation will make the voucher meaningless in the future. Those opposed to vouchers and those seeking to gain control of non-public education are thus presented with an annual opportunity to advance their agendas. (For example, one version of Pennsylvania's voucher bill included language that gave the state the ability to control the tuition of EVERY SCHOOL that accepted vouchers.) The universal tuition tax credit approach that Peg Luksik advocates has already been successfully implemented in Arizona and Minnesota, and is being actively promoted in Michigan. It has passed the constitutionality test. Tax credits have significant advantages over vouchers:
It's time to jettison a non-solution to a real problem and move forward to secure the best education for all our children! |